A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Climate Science and the Culture of Climate Change

This website focuses on the Culture of Climate Change, and NOT on climate science.  Spencer Weart is the expert-of-reference on the history of climate science.  However, the Culture of Climate Change is underwritten by climate science.  It is the scientific consensus that anthropogenic climate change threatens the ecological systems across the globe.  This scientific consensus is the motor that is driving huge investments in various climate change mitigation and adaptation programs.  What would happen to the UN international climate change regime if that consensus buckled?

Climate change skeptics are wandering in the wilderness — out of step with funding priorities, at odds with their powerful fellow scientists.    Apparently someone from that camp of beleaguered outsiders hacked into the email accounts of notable pro-climate change scientists, exposing office gossip that tarnishes the veneer of truth to climate change science.  It was a computer system at the University of East Anglia that was hacked.  A similar hack of the pro-climate change website www.realclimate.org was thwarted.

The anti-climate change hackers posted their heisted emails at The Air Vent, a site devoted to anti-climate change advocates.

Dr. Patrick J.  Michaels, a noted climate change skeptic, claims that some of these emails reveal an effort to block the release of data for independent review.

Dr. Mann, University of Pennsylvania, wrote one of the revealing emails in which he described using a  ‘trick’ to accomodate data inconsistent with climate warming.

For more of the skeptical point of view see Stephen McIntyre’s climateaudit.org

Gavin A. Schmidt, a climatologist at NASA, is one whose emails have been published publically. In his view, the emails reveal little other than the fact that scientists are human and prone to indisposition.   Schmidt is quoted as saying, “Newton may have been an ass, but the theory of gravity still works.”

Seeing REDD

In Peru, demonstrations in June of 2009 against government plans for forest use ended in violence that left dozens dead.

REDD = Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and environmental  Degradation.

[The Culture of Climate Change is not for those who wilt at the sight of acronyms.   I used to have such an aversion to acronyms that I literally could not read documents sprinkled heavily with these consonant-heavy capitalized clods.  They seemed to me somehow an indication of modern barbarism, and I am not sure that is not the case.  Still, I have had to put that behind me in order to research climate change issues.  Every issue, policy, or program comes with at least one, usually several, of these spell-check-defiant, not-quite neologisms.   ]

REDD is mostly the baby of the Norwegian government, with the backing as well of the UK.  It seeks to establish forest policies that preserve large tracts in less developed countries so that these can continue to absorb carbon emitted around the globe.  The largest forests are in the Amazon and in the Congo Basin.

If these forests are preserved, the carbon rights to them can be sold in the developing international carbon markets.

Question: who, within participating states,  gets the REDD money?  who gets the money from selling the carbon rights to these forests?  what happens to that money?

Question: what happens to the people who live in these forests? (see stories about deaths in Peru)

The Answers are still to be determined, but consider the following:

On the global level, billions of dollars each year will be allocated via these forest programs.  For example, it is projected that by 2015 from $10 to $20 billion will be allocated annually to forest programs.  The policies set in place by Copenhagen (and the pre and post Copenhagen processes) will determine how these funds flow from the global programs to national governments.

Such a huge flow of funds from the international community into forestry projects operated at the national level raises major issues of rights.

REDD is an initiative that is evolving via international negotiations centered around the United Nations and the World Bank.  Nationals governments with forests that can qualify for the REDD initiative are also making plans and participating in negotiations.  The overall shape of the REDD initiatives will arise out of this mixture of international and national decision making and policy expertise.

The interface between national governments and multilateral funds is a common focal point for many of these meetings.  It is crucial to develop this interface via a process that engages civil society and indigenous people and yet such engagement runs counter to the cult of expertise and statism.

The Price of Nature

The culture of climate change has encouraged putting a price tag on all the diverse elements of the natural world.  Whereas in the old era, pre-climate change culture, polluters polluted for free, in the new era carbon caps will gradually begin to exact payment for carbon emissions.

There is already a booming industry in carbon sequestration, and the Katoomba Group’s Ecosystem Marketplace is sharing expert news on how this is developing.

TakingIt Global: Youth Culture and Climate Change

Art, essays, and poetry on culture, identity and climate change are featured in the third issue of TIG, which stands for TakingIt Global.  This issue is multi-lingual, with contributions in original languages from around the globe.

FREEDOM SUMMER ’09

Freedom Summer ’09 is a group dedicated to making the summer of 2009 a memorable moment in the history of climate change activism.  Organized by Tom Pollak, Freedom Summer ’09 takes its name from the famous Freedom Summer of 1964, which featured voter registration of African Americans in Mississippi.   Freedom Summer ’09 aims to turn the youth enthusiasm for Barack Obama into more sustained activism centered around climate change.  They are looking for volunteers in the broader metro area of Washington, DC.

Old King Coal was a Merry Old Soul

The Climate Change bill (The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009) scheduled to come up for a vote next week in Congress contains language that ends key provisions of the Clean Air Act.   The proposed legislation would allow old coal plants to continue emitting based on free carbon allowances, and would allow some 100 new coal plants to be built.  The full information on the proposed house legislation can be found at the Committee on Energy and Commerce website.

For up-dated information on coal plants in every state in the USA, see the Sierra Club site, “Stopping the Coal Rush.”

Coal is abundant and cheap fuel.  It is also a huge contributer to carbon emissions, amounting to 40% of U.S. emissions.  Smoke stack filters and scrubbers remove toxic materials from coal soot, but do not reduce the carbon emissions.

Carbon capture and storage is the best hope for making coal power plants environmentally friendly, but this technology is still under development.  It has not been successfully achieved anyplace and key demonstration projects have been derailed by huge cost overruns.

Coal is plentiful and cheap.  The economy of the US is deeply dependent on coal power, as are the emerging economies of India and China.   (For more information, see the Time Magazine article on the politics of coal in the U.S.).

By the looks of the pending “Climate Change” legislation, the U.S. Congress will indeed support climate change, and King Coal, rather than climate stabilization and renewables.

Financing Community-based Climate Change Projects

The Global Environment Facility (GEF) funds small grants for climate change adaptation and mitigation.  These grants cannot be used to aid people displaced by climate change.  They can only be used for environmental projects.  So, if your aim is to aid people directly impacted by climate change, then you need to somehow develop a project focused on the environment that also helps the people in need.

These grants are designed for small group implementation and are supposed to be linked to community involvement.  However, non-profits can undertake the grant projects, provided there is also community involvement.  Applications are processed through national agencies in the project-site state.

As ‘Culture of Climate Change’ develops, we will research the outcomes of GEF grants.  If you have been involved in a GEF climate change project, send a comment and let us know how it went.

History of Climate Change Science

Spencer Weart’s website on the history of climate change science is a fabulous resource.

Gender Justice in Times of Climate Change

Gender Justice in Times of Climate Change was an international conference hosted in Poznan in December of 2008.  GenderCC and Genanet sponsored the events.

A commissioned study on gender and climate change in Ghana, Senegal and Bangladesh was published in 2008, and the World Conservation Union published a fact sheet on gender and climate change in 2007.  The Canadian International Development Agency published a similar fact sheet.

The United Nations Development Program hosts a site on women and climate change.

Kathleen Mogelgaard minces no words with the title to her recent article, “Climate Change is sexist“.  Mogelgaard writes on behalf of Population Action International.

Rachel Masika, writing for the Oxfam project on Gender, published Gender,  Development, and Climate Change in 2002.

Living on Earth hosted a show on gender and climate change in February 2009.  It has the transcript posted on-line.

Euro-China Culture of Climate Change Arts Dialogue

In October of 2008 a group of European and Chinese artists met in Beijing for a cross-cultural dialogue on how the arts can respond to climate change.  The events were ponsored by the Asia-Europe Foundation, Central Academy of Fine Arts, the Chinese Academy of Social Science, the Research Centre for Sustainable Development (RCSD), the China Meteorological Administration, and Cultura21.

Dialogue on the Arts, Culture and Climate Change hosted forty participants from Europe and Asia.